← All Washington markets
Competitive Analysis — Seattle-Tacoma · YTD

Seattle-Tacoma Market Competitive Analysis

593+ legal advertisers ran TV advertising in Seattle-Tacoma, WA year-to-date. This view measures delivered viewing volume — eyeballs on screen — and where it splits across broadcast, vMVPD, and streaming.

Broadcast Share
54%
Of delivered impressions
Streaming Share
42%
Of delivered impressions
Active Advertisers
593+
Legal-services firms in market
Competitive Landscape

Who's running — and where

593+ advertisers ran in Seattle-Tacoma, WA's legal category year-to-date. By delivered impressions, the full market is roughly 54% Broadcast / 4% vMVPD / 42% Streaming. Narrowing to the 14 firms actually competing locally shifts that mix to 90% / 3% / 7% — the streaming share in the full-market view is largely national advertisers delivering CTV into the market.

Full Seattle-Tacoma Market (593+ Firms) · Channel Mix
Broadcast 54%
Streaming 42%
Local Competitive Set (14 Firms) · Channel Mix
Broadcast 90%
7%
Broadcast (OTA affiliates & networks)
vMVPD (live-TV streaming bundles)
Streaming (CTV apps & devices)
Top 14 Competitors · Share of Voice by Channel (% of local set, YTD)
#FirmShare of VoiceChannel MixBroadcast %vMVPD %Streaming %
Majors  ·  8% – 22% share of voice
1Bernard Law Group22.1%
97%2%1%
2The Advocates Injury Attorneys17.7%
90%3%7%
3Dubin Law Group16.2%
77%3%20%
4Pendergast Law16.0%
94%2%4%
5Davis Law Group8.0%
95%3%2%
Mid-Pack  ·  <1% – 7% share of voice
6Boohoff Law6.8%
96%2%2%
7Phillips Law Firm5.5%
95%0%5%
8Law Offices Of Harold D Carr4.3%
81%5%14%
9Life Point Law1.2%
91%3%6%
10Washington Auto Law1.0%
90%2%8%
11Puget Law Group0.7%
56%2%42%
12Warrior Injury Law0.2%
98%2%0%
13Russell & Hill Law Firm0.1%
19%60%21%
14Brumback & Ottem Injury Law<0.1%
67%16%17%

Share of Voice is each firm's share of the 14-firm competitive set's impressions — not of the full market.

Publisher Intelligence

Share of voice — who owns what

Share of voice across the competitive set — the 14 firms competing in Seattle-Tacoma year-to-date, by station & publisher.

Publisher Share — % of Competitive Set
Competitor Share of Voice by Publisher Each firm's share of the competitive set's impressions on that publisher.
Firms: Bernard Law GroupThe AdvocatesDubin Law GroupPendergast LawDavis Law GroupBoohoff LawPhillipsLaw Offices Of Harold D CarrLife Point LawWashington Auto LawPuget Law GroupWarrior Injury LawRussell & HillBrumback & Ottem Injury Law

Ranked competitor detail by publisher

Each card is one station or publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every competitor in the set with measurable impressions.

KOMO
Broadcast
25% of set delivery · 13 of 14 active
  1. 1
    The Advocates
    26.1%
  2. 2
    Bernard Law Group
    21.9%
  3. 3
    Pendergast Law
    16.8%
  4. 4
    Davis Law Group
    12.5%
  5. 5
    Dubin Law Group
    12.3%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Boohoff Law
    6.2%
  2. 7
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    4.2%
  3. 8
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.0%
  4. 9
    Russell & Hill
    0.0%
  5. 10
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.0%
  6. 11
    Washington Auto Law
    0.0%
  7. 12
    Life Point Law
    0.0%
  8. 13
    Puget Law Group
    0.0%
KCPQ
Broadcast
20% of set delivery · 13 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Bernard Law Group
    29.3%
  2. 2
    Pendergast Law
    15.8%
  3. 3
    Dubin Law Group
    15.1%
  4. 4
    The Advocates
    14.2%
  5. 5
    Boohoff Law
    7.9%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Davis Law Group
    6.1%
  2. 7
    Life Point Law
    4.4%
  3. 8
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    3.3%
  4. 9
    Washington Auto Law
    2.1%
  5. 10
    Puget Law Group
    1.7%
  6. 11
    Russell & Hill
    0.0%
  7. 12
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.0%
  8. 13
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.0%
KING
Broadcast
19% of set delivery · 12 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Bernard Law Group
    24.5%
  2. 2
    The Advocates
    23.4%
  3. 3
    Dubin Law Group
    14.8%
  4. 4
    Pendergast Law
    12.7%
  5. 5
    Davis Law Group
    10.2%
Show all 12 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Boohoff Law
    8.9%
  2. 7
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    3.8%
  3. 8
    Washington Auto Law
    1.6%
  4. 9
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.1%
  5. 10
    Russell & Hill
    0.1%
  6. 11
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.0%
  7. 12
    Life Point Law
    0.0%
KIRO
Broadcast
14% of set delivery · 12 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Bernard Law Group
    31.4%
  2. 2
    Pendergast Law
    21.9%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    13.0%
  4. 4
    Davis Law Group
    11.1%
  5. 5
    Boohoff Law
    9.4%
Show all 12 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Dubin Law Group
    7.4%
  2. 7
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    4.0%
  3. 8
    Warrior Injury Law
    1.6%
  4. 9
    Puget Law Group
    0.2%
  5. 10
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.0%
  6. 11
    Russell & Hill
    0.0%
  7. 12
    Life Point Law
    0.0%
KZJO
Broadcast
3% of set delivery · 11 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Bernard Law Group
    23.4%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    21.3%
  3. 3
    Pendergast Law
    15.1%
  4. 4
    Life Point Law
    11.2%
  5. 5
    The Advocates
    9.8%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Boohoff Law
    8.2%
  2. 7
    Washington Auto Law
    6.3%
  3. 8
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    2.9%
  4. 9
    Davis Law Group
    1.0%
  5. 10
    Puget Law Group
    0.8%
  6. 11
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.0%
YouTube App
Streaming App
3% of set delivery · 13 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    76.4%
  2. 2
    Pendergast Law
    17.3%
  3. 3
    Puget Law Group
    3.2%
  4. 4
    The Advocates
    1.3%
  5. 5
    Boohoff Law
    1.0%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Davis Law Group
    0.4%
  2. 7
    Russell & Hill
    0.2%
  3. 8
    Bernard Law Group
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    0.1%
  5. 10
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.0%
  6. 11
    Washington Auto Law
    0.0%
  7. 12
    Life Point Law
    0.0%
  8. 13
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.0%
KONG
Broadcast
2% of set delivery · 11 of 14 active
  1. 1
    The Advocates
    38.8%
  2. 2
    Bernard Law Group
    29.8%
  3. 3
    Boohoff Law
    12.1%
  4. 4
    Pendergast Law
    8.6%
  5. 5
    Davis Law Group
    7.2%
Show all 11 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Dubin Law Group
    1.7%
  2. 7
    Washington Auto Law
    1.5%
  3. 8
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.1%
  4. 9
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.1%
  5. 10
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    0.0%
  6. 11
    Russell & Hill
    0.0%
XFINITY Streaming
vMVPD
2% of set delivery · 13 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    19.4%
  2. 2
    The Advocates
    19.2%
  3. 3
    Bernard Law Group
    18.8%
  4. 4
    Pendergast Law
    15.1%
  5. 5
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    9.6%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Davis Law Group
    8.8%
  2. 7
    Boohoff Law
    5.6%
  3. 8
    Life Point Law
    1.1%
  4. 9
    Russell & Hill
    0.8%
  5. 10
    Washington Auto Law
    0.7%
  6. 11
    Puget Law Group
    0.4%
  7. 12
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.2%
  8. 13
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.1%
KSTW
Broadcast
2% of set delivery · 10 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Bernard Law Group
    47.1%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    17.7%
  3. 3
    Boohoff Law
    16.2%
  4. 4
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    10.6%
  5. 5
    The Advocates
    8.2%
Show all 10 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Davis Law Group
    0.1%
  2. 7
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.0%
  3. 8
    Pendergast Law
    0.0%
  4. 9
    Russell & Hill
    0.0%
  5. 10
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.0%
FNC
1% of set delivery · 2 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Pendergast Law
    79.9%
  2. 2
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    20.1%
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Other App
Streaming App
1% of set delivery · 13 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    55.4%
  2. 2
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    24.1%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    7.1%
  4. 4
    Washington Auto Law
    4.0%
  5. 5
    Bernard Law Group
    3.3%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Pendergast Law
    1.9%
  2. 7
    Davis Law Group
    1.6%
  3. 8
    Puget Law Group
    0.8%
  4. 9
    Boohoff Law
    0.7%
  5. 10
    Life Point Law
    0.6%
  6. 11
    Russell & Hill
    0.3%
  7. 12
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.2%
  8. 13
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.0%
Tubi TV App
Streaming App
1% of set delivery · 12 of 14 active
  1. 1
    The Advocates
    60.5%
  2. 2
    Puget Law Group
    14.8%
  3. 3
    Dubin Law Group
    9.0%
  4. 4
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    6.1%
  5. 5
    Life Point Law
    4.1%
Show all 12 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Bernard Law Group
    1.9%
  2. 7
    Washington Auto Law
    1.6%
  3. 8
    Davis Law Group
    0.8%
  4. 9
    Boohoff Law
    0.5%
  5. 10
    Pendergast Law
    0.3%
  6. 11
    Russell & Hill
    0.3%
  7. 12
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.1%
ESPN
1% of set delivery · 7 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Pendergast Law
    56.4%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    36.0%
  3. 3
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    7.2%
  4. 4
    Davis Law Group
    0.4%
  5. 5
    Life Point Law
    0.0%
Show all 7 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    The Advocates
    0.0%
  2. 7
    Russell & Hill
    0.0%
Roku
Device
1% of set delivery · 13 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    30.9%
  2. 2
    The Advocates
    23.8%
  3. 3
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    12.7%
  4. 4
    Bernard Law Group
    9.6%
  5. 5
    Pendergast Law
    7.3%
Show all 13 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Davis Law Group
    7.3%
  2. 7
    Boohoff Law
    2.4%
  3. 8
    Puget Law Group
    2.1%
  4. 9
    Life Point Law
    1.7%
  5. 10
    Russell & Hill
    1.2%
  6. 11
    Washington Auto Law
    0.9%
  7. 12
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.1%
  8. 13
    Warrior Injury Law
    0.0%
Pluto TV App
Streaming App
0% of set delivery · 12 of 14 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    53.4%
  2. 2
    The Advocates
    20.4%
  3. 3
    Law Offices Of Harold D Carr
    14.9%
  4. 4
    Davis Law Group
    5.5%
  5. 5
    Bernard Law Group
    2.2%
Show all 12 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Washington Auto Law
    0.8%
  2. 7
    Life Point Law
    0.8%
  3. 8
    Puget Law Group
    0.6%
  4. 9
    Pendergast Law
    0.5%
  5. 10
    Russell & Hill
    0.4%
  6. 11
    Boohoff Law
    0.3%
  7. 12
    Brumback & Ottem Injury Law
    0.1%
Competitor Creative

The creative landscape

Active spots running in the Seattle-Tacoma market this period.

DLG
Contact Us
Dubin Law Group
Personal Injury
PLG
Free Call
Puget Law Group
Personal Injury
PLF
Justice For You
Phillips Law Firm
Personal Injury
BLG
No Win No Fee
Bernard Law Group
Personal Injury

Methodology and Definitions

1. Data Sourcing & Collection

Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.

2. Channel Categorization

Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.

Broadcast
Local station-originated linear & cable
Local OTA broadcast affiliates (Seattle: KOMO/KING/KIRO/KCPQ; Spokane: KHQ/KREM/KXLY; Yakima-Tri-Cities: KIMA/KEPR/KAPP), national broadcast networks, syndicated broadcast, and traditional linear cable/satellite (Xfinity, Spectrum, Cox, DirecTV/Dish) — viewed via antenna or linear carriage.
vMVPD
Streaming delivery of linear feeds
Live-TV streaming bundles and MVPD streaming apps — YouTube TV, Hulu Live, Sling, fuboTV, Philo, plus XFINITY, DirecTV, Dish, Cox, Spectrum and Uverse Streaming. Internet-delivered, but the content is broadcast-originated linear, so it's reported on its own line.
CTV / Streaming
True app-based connected-TV
Ad-supported streaming apps (Peacock, Pluto, Tubi, Paramount+), the YouTube app, and peripheral devices (Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, Xbox, PlayStation) — true OTT inventory distinct from the linear feed.

3. Competitive Set

The full market view counts every legal advertiser detected delivering impressions in the market, including national advertisers running connected-TV into the area. The competitive set narrows to the firms actually competing locally — national mass-tort and out-of-market advertisers are set aside so the local picture isn't distorted by national streaming volume. A firm is kept in the local set if it shows meaningful local-broadcast delivery or competes at material scale in the market.

Impressions are directional estimates from a panel-based measurement methodology. A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show some streaming exposure because ACR captures incidental viewing across the connected-TV panel.

4. Glossary