← All Washington markets
Competitive Analysis — Spokane · YTD

Spokane Market Competitive Analysis

380+ legal advertisers ran TV advertising in Spokane, WA year-to-date. This view measures delivered viewing volume — eyeballs on screen — and where it splits across broadcast, vMVPD, and streaming.

Broadcast Share
22%
Of delivered impressions
Streaming Share
61%
Of delivered impressions
Active Advertisers
380+
Legal-services firms in market
Competitive Landscape

Who's running — and where

380+ advertisers ran in Spokane, WA's legal category year-to-date. By delivered impressions, the full market is roughly 22% Broadcast / 17% vMVPD / 61% Streaming. Narrowing to the 7 firms actually competing locally shifts that mix to 41% / 37% / 22% — the streaming share in the full-market view is largely national advertisers delivering CTV into the market.

Full Spokane Market (380+ Firms) · Channel Mix
Broadcast 22%
vMVPD 17%
Streaming 61%
Local Competitive Set (7 Firms) · Channel Mix
Broadcast 41%
vMVPD 37%
Streaming 22%
Broadcast (OTA affiliates & networks)
vMVPD (live-TV streaming bundles)
Streaming (CTV apps & devices)
Top 7 Competitors · Share of Voice by Channel (% of local set, YTD)
#FirmShare of VoiceChannel MixBroadcast %vMVPD %Streaming %
Majors  ·  1% – 35% share of voice
1Russell & Hill Law Firm35.3%
46%41%13%
2Dubin Law Group33.4%
32%31%37%
3The Advocates Injury Attorneys27.4%
47%36%17%
4Maurer Law1.8%
18%70%12%
5Penar Law1.4%
56%39%5%
Mid-Pack  ·  <1% – <1% share of voice
6Marken Law Group0.4%
59%37%4%
7Attorney Michael Wright0.3%
20%0%80%

Share of Voice is each firm's share of the 7-firm competitive set's impressions — not of the full market.

Publisher Intelligence

Share of voice — who owns what

Share of voice across the competitive set — the 7 firms competing in Spokane year-to-date, by station & publisher.

Publisher Share — % of Competitive Set
Competitor Share of Voice by Publisher Each firm's share of the competitive set's impressions on that publisher.
Firms: Russell & HillDubin Law GroupThe AdvocatesMaurer LawPenar LawMarken Law GroupAttorney Michael Wright

Ranked competitor detail by publisher

Each card is one station or publisher. Top 5 advertisers ranked by SOV on that publisher. Click Show all to expand to every competitor in the set with measurable impressions.

KHQ
Broadcast
20% of set delivery · 4 of 7 active
  1. 1
    The Advocates
    34.8%
  2. 2
    Russell & Hill
    32.7%
  3. 3
    Dubin Law Group
    31.0%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    1.5%
  5. 5
Dish Streaming
vMVPD
12% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    39.0%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    27.6%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    27.6%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    3.9%
  5. 5
    Penar Law
    1.5%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.4%
XFINITY Streaming
vMVPD
12% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    37.8%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    30.7%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    26.6%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    3.0%
  5. 5
    Penar Law
    1.4%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.6%
OTA
Broadcast
8% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    42.6%
  2. 2
    The Advocates
    32.6%
  3. 3
    Dubin Law Group
    20.3%
  4. 4
    Penar Law
    3.2%
  5. 5
    Marken Law Group
    1.4%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Maurer Law
    0.0%
YouTube App
Streaming App
8% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    84.9%
  2. 2
    Russell & Hill
    13.4%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    1.5%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    0.1%
  5. 5
    Penar Law
    0.0%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.0%
DirecTV Streaming
vMVPD
6% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    35.1%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    30.9%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    29.1%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    3.2%
  5. 5
    Penar Law
    1.3%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.4%
YouTube TV App
vMVPD
4% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    52.4%
  2. 2
    The Advocates
    23.1%
  3. 3
    Dubin Law Group
    18.4%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    4.2%
  5. 5
    Penar Law
    1.9%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.1%
Spectrum Streaming
vMVPD
3% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    42.0%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    28.4%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    24.9%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    2.4%
  5. 5
    Penar Law
    1.8%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.5%
KAYU
Broadcast
3% of set delivery · 3 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    54.1%
  2. 2
    Dubin Law Group
    34.1%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    11.9%
  4. 4
  5. 5
Roku
Device
3% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    37.3%
  2. 2
    Russell & Hill
    31.3%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    27.1%
  4. 4
    Maurer Law
    3.3%
  5. 5
    Penar Law
    0.8%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.2%
Tubi TV App
Streaming App
3% of set delivery · 3 of 7 active
  1. 1
    The Advocates
    74.5%
  2. 2
    Russell & Hill
    17.0%
  3. 3
    Dubin Law Group
    8.5%
  4. 4
  5. 5
Other App
Streaming App
3% of set delivery · 6 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    70.7%
  2. 2
    Russell & Hill
    16.9%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    11.0%
  4. 4
    Penar Law
    0.7%
  5. 5
    Maurer Law
    0.6%
Show all 6 analyzed competitors
  1. 6
    Marken Law Group
    0.1%
KREM
Broadcast
2% of set delivery · 5 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    34.1%
  2. 2
    Russell & Hill
    33.1%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    29.4%
  4. 4
    Penar Law
    3.2%
  5. 5
    Marken Law Group
    0.1%
KXLY
Broadcast
2% of set delivery · 4 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Russell & Hill
    52.3%
  2. 2
    The Advocates
    35.0%
  3. 3
    Penar Law
    9.8%
  4. 4
    Marken Law Group
    3.0%
  5. 5
KLEW
Broadcast
2% of set delivery · 5 of 7 active
  1. 1
    Dubin Law Group
    40.1%
  2. 2
    Russell & Hill
    32.2%
  3. 3
    The Advocates
    21.0%
  4. 4
    Penar Law
    6.7%
  5. 5
    Marken Law Group
    0.1%
Competitor Creative

The creative landscape

Active spots running in the Spokane market this period.

MLG
No Fee
Marken Law Group
Personal Injury
DLG
Contact Us
Dubin Law Group
Personal Injury
PL
Consultation
Penar Law
Personal Injury
ML
Just Call
Maurer Law
Personal Injury

Methodology and Definitions

1. Data Sourcing & Collection

Our platform uses Automatic Content Recognition (ACR) to capture real-time viewing data from the "glass" of over 23 million opted-in U.S. households, across a diverse panel of devices (Vizio, LG) and peripheral inputs. Each captured ad is fingerprinted and matched against a comprehensive ad library to verify when and where it aired.

2. Channel Categorization

Each advertiser's activity is split across three mutually exclusive channels.

Broadcast
Local station-originated linear & cable
Local OTA broadcast affiliates (Seattle: KOMO/KING/KIRO/KCPQ; Spokane: KHQ/KREM/KXLY; Yakima-Tri-Cities: KIMA/KEPR/KAPP), national broadcast networks, syndicated broadcast, and traditional linear cable/satellite (Xfinity, Spectrum, Cox, DirecTV/Dish) — viewed via antenna or linear carriage.
vMVPD
Streaming delivery of linear feeds
Live-TV streaming bundles and MVPD streaming apps — YouTube TV, Hulu Live, Sling, fuboTV, Philo, plus XFINITY, DirecTV, Dish, Cox, Spectrum and Uverse Streaming. Internet-delivered, but the content is broadcast-originated linear, so it's reported on its own line.
CTV / Streaming
True app-based connected-TV
Ad-supported streaming apps (Peacock, Pluto, Tubi, Paramount+), the YouTube app, and peripheral devices (Roku, Fire TV, Apple TV, Xbox, PlayStation) — true OTT inventory distinct from the linear feed.

3. Competitive Set

The full market view counts every legal advertiser detected delivering impressions in the market, including national advertisers running connected-TV into the area. The competitive set narrows to the firms actually competing locally — national mass-tort and out-of-market advertisers are set aside so the local picture isn't distorted by national streaming volume. A firm is kept in the local set if it shows meaningful local-broadcast delivery or competes at material scale in the market.

Impressions are directional estimates from a panel-based measurement methodology. A predominantly broadcast-led advertiser will still show some streaming exposure because ACR captures incidental viewing across the connected-TV panel.

4. Glossary